December 2003
- 30: Williamsburg’s Village Idiot (33)
- 30: Clueless Quote (1)
- 29: 60 Million Frenchmen Can’t Be Wrong. Can They? (2)
- 29: “Diversity,” Difference, Discrimination (1)
- 28: Faith, Hope, And An Absence Of Charity (1)
- 28: The Best Laid Plans (0)
- 28: Shootout At Gender Gap (1)
- 27: The President As National Nanny? No. Camp Counselor? Yes. (2)
- 27: Dean Discovers Jesus (3)
- 27: Multicultural? (2)
- 26: Sects Discrimination (4)
- 24: Can The State Discriminate Against Religion? (4)
- 24: Is Texas Re-Districting Anti-Semitic? (2)
- 23: Debating Racial Preference (0)
- 22: Kwanzaa And The Serial Comma (4)
- 21: A Wolf In Wolfe’s Clothing (0)
- 18: WaPo: Leaping To Conclusions (7)
- 17: Islamic High School Student Arrested; CAIR Claims Discrimination (7)
- 17: Dean & Dukakis: Two Peas In A Pod (2)
- 17: “Diversity” Or Racial Balance? (1)
- 17: Kerry, Kerry, Quite Contrary (3)
- 15: Is The ERA Era Over? (3)
- 15: Discrimination? It Depends… (0)
- 14: Return To The Articles of Confederation? Consider An Odd But Revealing Democratic Quote (5)
- 14: “All Eyes Are On The State Of Texas …” (3)
- 14: What’s Good For
General Motors[One Race] Is Good For the Country (1) - 14: More Hubris From The New York Times (2)
- 14: Civil Disobedience? (6)
- 13: Heh! Heh! (1)
- 13: Heh! (2)
- 12: Is Non-Discrimination Discriminatory? (1)
- 12: FIRE Defends Affirmative Action Bake Sales (6)
- 11: “So Much Horse Puckey” (0)
- 11: Racial Equality At Texas A&M (6)
- 11: Good New Blog (0)
- 10: “Diversity,” Unless You Disagree (5)
- 10: Dean, Buckshot, And Rear Ends (1)
- 09: A Jolting Development…. (1)
- 09: More “Sauce For The Goose Is … Sauce For The Goose”” (6)
- 09: Both Left And Right Can (For Once) Agree… (0)
- 06: Colorado Democrats Baffled (0)
- 06: Judge Not (2)
- 06: On Whom Is The Joke? (17)
- 04: Texas A&M Rejects Race As Admissions Factor (11)
- 04: Ah, The Democrats! (3)
- 04: Warning! Travel Could Hazardous To Your Health! (1)
- 04: A Familiar Controversy (0)
- 03: Affirmative Reaction (2)
- 03: Still Joking? (12)
- 03: Gimme That Ole Time (Anti-) Religion… (4)
- 02: “I’m Nobody’s ‘Minority'” (1)
- 01: BAMN BAMN (1)
November 2003
- 28: One More Fish-ism To Fry (1)
- 28: More Fish Tales (2)
- 28: A Sad Commentary (12)
- 27: Thanksgiving! (1)
- 26: Unintended Self Satire (1)
- 25: The Pot Calls The Kettle [Diverse] (2)
- 25: A Polygamy Hypothetical (5)
- 24: Federalism And States’ Rights: In Principle And Against Principle (1)
- 23: Black Power (3)
- 22: The Liberal/Conservative Case Against Preferences (3)
- 21: Crime Wave Of (Fake) Hate Crimes (5)
- 21: Writers’ Blog, Or: Bloggers May Be Crazy (5)
- 21: More N-Word Mania (6)
- 20: What’s Sauce For The Goose Is … Sauce For The Goose (5)
- 20: Democratic Judge-Blocking Tactics Revealed (3)
- 20: F.I.R.E. Shouting On Campuses Crowded With The Uninformed (0)
- 20: Another Reductio Ad Absurdum Moment (1)
- 19: Reductio Reductio Ad Absurdum (5)
- 18: “Real Men Don’t Do Workshops” (1)
- 18: Racism Makes You Stupid (3)
- 17: Holier Than
ThouWe (1) - 17: VP = Vapidly Pious! (3)
- 16: Strange Fruit: The Politics Of Linguistic Lynching (1)
- 15: “A More Inclusive Approach To Diversity”? (1)
- 15: A Stimulating Panel On Affirmative Action At CU (0)
- 14: Race And Gender Gaps, Louisiana Style (4)
- 14: Who Are The “Real Liberals”? (0)
- 14: Advice From A Senior Diversiphile (0)
- 14: Dr. Dean, The Race Man (0)
- 13: Senate Democrats And The New “Concurrent Majority” (3)
- 12: Foot In Mouth Or Just A Tin Ear At SLATE? (3)
- 12: More On Dr. Dean Punching The Tarbaby… (2)
- 12: “Diversity” + Discretion = Discrimination (2)
- 11: More Diversity Perversity (2)
- 10: Dean And The Tarbaby (6)
- 10: Discrimination And Disingenuousness At American Law Schools (4)
- 09: Discriminating Democrats (2)
- 08: Extra Time On The GRE: Allowed? Maybe. But Required? (9)
- 07: Now The French Are Doing It… (5)
- 07: How The Cookies Crumble (0)
- 06: Dean On The South: “Race, Guns, God, And Gays” (5)
- 04: Race Not A Factor! (Except At Berkeley And UCLA) (11)
- 04: Homosexuality, Hegemony, Hypocrisy (2)
- 04: Must We Offer Alternatives To Affirmative Action? (46)
- 03: Binge Drinking And Racial Stereotypes (9)
- 02: Gun Quiz (WaPo, Dems Fail) (3)
- 02: Newsweep (14)
October 2003
- 31: More Diversity, Fewer Drunks… (10)
- 30: The Specter Specter (0)
- 30: Passport To Nowhere (3)
- 30: Shooting The Messenger (2)
- 29: More Un-Diverse “Diversity” (0)
- 29: While Howard Slept (2)
- 29: Half-Baked (0)
- 29: Birds Of A Feather? (0)
- 28: Who’s Dumb? (12)
- 27: Quote Of The Week (0)
- 27: Colleges Kowtowing To Corporate Control? (0)
- 27: Same Old New York Times II (5)
- 26: Same Old New York Times II (0)
- 26: A Rousing Good Protest (2)
- 25: “Comprehensive Review” Or Racial Profiling? (2)
- 24: A-Stigma-Tism (3)
- 22: The Brown Case (7)
- 22: Shucking And Jibing On the “Diversity” Front (1)
- 22: Say It Taina So… (2)
- 22: Jumping To Conclusions (2)
- 21: “This Is Philosophical War …” (10)
- 21: The Gay Bishop, God’s Work, And Civil Rights (6)
- 19: Yet More On “Diversity” At UVa (4)
- 18: Richard Rorty And The Promise Of America (2)
- 18: UVa Debate On Affirmative Action (1)
- 18: Qualifications And “Diversity” (3)
- 16: “Diversiy” And Quotas (0)
- 16: More Double Standards In Charlottesville (1)
- 15: Latinos On Hispanic Committee (2)
- 15: Biased “Bias” (3)
- 14: Critical Thinking And Diversity Discrepancies (1)
- 14: And Now Some Neo-Confederate Idiocy (0)
- 14: More Waving Of The Bloody Shirt (2)
- 14: “Diversity” Requires Redistribution (1)
- 13: A Diversity Handicap (13)
- 12: Democrats Need More Poor (Or At Least Unassimilated) Latinos (3)
- 12: More Un-Diverse “Diversity” (0)
- 12: Diversity: Less Is More? (8)
- 11: Redistricting Role Reversal (5)
- 10: The More Things Change … (0)
- 09: Some Disparaging Words About “Parity” (1)
- 08: The Perils Of Racial Recruitment (0)
- 08: The Left Coast In Red And Green (2)
- 07: Thanks, Bill (3)
- 07: Toni Morrison On The Relevance Of Race [Not] (1)
- 06: “Horse Puckey”! (1)
- 06: Arkansas Reduces Merit, Adds Minority Scholarships (3)
- 05: Plame Game (11)
- 03: Number 2 Pencil Temporarily Broken… (1)
- 03: Diversity Schizophrenia At UVa (1)
- 03: The Irony Of “Judgment To Rush” (1)
- 03: Color-Blind and Just Plain Blind (0)
- 02: Blacks, Asians Excluded From LA Times Poll (0)
- 02: Is “Diversity” Mandatory? (2)
- 02: The Practice of “Diversity” (0)
- 01: Love and Confusion in Berkeley (1)
- 01: Profundity of the Day (0)
September 2003
- 30: Redistricting and the Perversity of “Diversity” (1)
- 30: Surprise! “Diversity” Engenders … Diversity at UVa (0)
- 28: Dramatic New Poll: Minorities Support Prop. 54! (9)
- 28: Debating Point (2)
- 26: More Daisy Dissent (1)
- 25: The Irony of “Diversity” (1)
- 25: SMU’s Half Baked Idea of Free Speech (3)
- 25: Should The Constitution Be Scrapped? (2)
- 24: A “Right” To Diversity? (2)
- 24: Rape. Reminds Me Of … (2)
- 24: Redistricting Double Standards And The Debasement Of Argument (0)
- 23: Subsidizing Un-Diversity (0)
- 23: New Blog Alert! (2)
- 23: More on UVa (3)
- 22: Monkey Business II (0)
- 22: Isabel Interruption Concluded (1)
- 20: Embarrassing Comments From Stanford (0)
- 20: DISCRIMINATIONS as Hate Speech? (5)
- 20: Isabel Interruption (1)
- 18: Governor Moonbeam II (7)
- 18: Monkey Business (0)
- 17: “Special Measures,” Or: When Is Discrimination Not Discrimination?(When It’s In California) (0)
- 16: UVa Students Object to Diversity Initiative (5)
- 15: Partisan Court(s) (4)
- 15: “Diversity” and Discomfort at UVa (0)
- 14: “Diversity” in Dean-Land (3)
- 14: Race and Rights in Paradise (9)
- 14: Criticism of “Critical Thinking” (0)
- 14: The Racial Privacy Initiative Will Fail … (0)
- 14: Man of Steele (0)
- 13: Quote of the Day II: No Democrat is “Divisive” (0)
- 13: Quote of the Day I: “I want to be diverse …” (0)
- 11: The “Intolerable Clause” And Lost Honor (4)
- 11: The Decline Of Diversity … Among Immigrants (0)
- 11: Conservative Talk Show Hosts and Listerners Are “Apes” (3)
- 10: Schuck On Grutter! (1)
- 10: OFF TOPIC: Can’t See The Forest(er) For the Trés… (8)
- 09: Indiana University Official Defends Free Speech! (Unless You’re Talking About Race) (0)
- 09: Flagging Concerns (1)
- 08: Nix On “The Mix” (2)
- 07: Orwellian Notes (3)
- 07: Tainted Money (0)
- 06: Hispanics? (1)
- 05: Nice Blog, Nice Post (0)
- 05: Daisy, Diversity, And “The Mix” (2)
- 04: MALDEF Sues Virginia Colleges (3)
- 03: Señor Tomas Jefferson? (2)
- 03: New Michigan Rules Catch Flack In … Michigan (4)
- 03: Quota Un-Quota II (0)
- 03: Busting Bustamante (0)
- 03: Establishing Establishment, Or Not (0)
- 02: More On Michigan’s Minorities (8)
August 2003
- 31: Family Diversity (0)
- 30: Greetings From Bryn Mawr (3)
- 28: The NAACP On Racial Data In Florida And California (1)
- 28: Light Blogging (4)
- 25: Hispanic Or Latino? (7)
- 24: King, Character, And Creed (1)
- 24: Immoderate Notions Of “Moderate” (7)
- 23: My Problem With Pragmatism (Or At Least One Of Them) (1)
- 22: Keep Your Eyes On What Prize? (7)
- 20: “Diversity” In A Highly Selective High School (9)
- 20: Cheap Shot (0)
- 20: How To Appeal To Democrats? Stress “Racial Unity”! (1)
- 18: Senior Diversity (1)
- 17: Blogger In The News (0)
- 17: Desegregation Cases Die … Of Old Age (4)
- 14: Light Blogging (0)
- 13: Democratic Disorder (2)
- 12: Indian Givers (0)
- 12: No Whites Need Apply (For School Transfers) (0)
- 12: A**Holes At The University Of Michigan (8)
- 11: All Children Are Above Average… (2)
- 11: Testiness Over Religious (But Not Racial) Tests (0)
- 10: Affirmative Action [Preferences] For Gays? (3)
- 09: Recall Objectivity? (0)
- 08: Grutter Clutter (4)
- 07: Racial Privacy? Not Enough Time To Decide (2)
- 05: Storm Warning (1)
- 03: Playing The Race Card (10)
- 03: Hispanic Diversity (0)
- 03: Will-ful Conservatism (2)
- 02: “Contentious Views On Race … “ (0)
- 01: Comity Comedy (5)
- 01: Moot Court, Mute Judges (0)
- 01: Is Howard Dean A Liberal? (2)
July 2003
- 30: Howard Dean Opposes (Some) Discrimination (0)
- 30: Is CRECNO All It’s Cracked Up To Be? (1)
- 29: CRECNO: Correct, Or No? (3)
- 29: Democrats + Hypocrisy = DEMOCRISY? (0)
- 29: Strictly From Unger (0)
- 29: Progressive Equality (1)
- 25: Having Your Campaign Reform And Eating It, Too (2)
- 23: Plausible Democrat? (0)
- 21: “Diversity” At UVa, As Reported (Or Not) In The Washington Post (3)
- 20: Victims Without Remedies (0)
- 20: Caste Benefit Analysis (1)
- 17: Elite Academia Thumbs Nose At Justice O’Connor (2)
- 15: MIGOP: What Glop! (5)
- 15: Civil Rights May Yet Live … In Colorado (0)
- 15: A Laboratory of Affirmative Action (0)
- 14: Discriminatory Dating (0)
- 13: Un-Constitutional … But O.K., Says O’C. (2)
- 11: Race Data: Perception v. Reality (7)
- 10: The Fruits Of “Pragmatism” I: On To Michigan… (5)
- 08: Telling Stories (2)
- 07: Courting Public Opinion (3)
- 06: Comedy (Or Is It Tragedy?) In The San Francisco Chronicle (2)
- 06: Comedy In The New York Times (7)
- 05: WaPo Hostility To Color-Blindness (0)
- 05: E Pluribus Pluribus (4)
- 05: Another Nice Liberal (1)
- 02: Republicans Could Reverse Grutter (2)
- 02: Gay Pride And Civil Rights (7)
- 02: “Diversity” Requires And Reinforces Stereotypes (3)
- 01: An Opinion That Smells Like Fish (1)
June 2003
- 30: Discrimination? Divine If “Benign,” Perfidious If “Invidious” (4)
- 27: Will-ful Optimism Unjustified (2)
- 26: Preliminary Queries (2)
- 26: The New Diversity (3)
- 26: Race Consciousness And Neutrality (?) (0)
- 25: SanDra Day +2 (4)
- 24: SAnDra DAY (29)
- 22: Hiatus Explained… (3)
- 22: Principles And Orlando Patterson (3)
- 18: Where There’s A Will There’s A (Right) Way (1)
- 18: Poynter Needs Some Pointers (1)
- 17: Amitai Is Back (0)
- 17: As Goes Brazil… (0)
- 15: Jury Tampering (20)
- 14: Emoluments (4)
- 14: Diversity As Race-Norming (1)
- 12: Boston Trip (1)
- 08: Muller On Profiling (12)
- 07: Busing Redux: Racial School Assignment (10)
- 07: Subsequent, And Substantial, Sixth Circuit Secrets Surface (1)
- 07: It’s A Crock (15)
- 06: Rednecks And Racism (4)
- 06: Affirmative Misconduct (1)
- 06: Wolfe Reviews Schuck; DISCRIMINATIONS Reviews Wolfe (0)
- 05: The Buck Passes (2)
- 05: Best Of The “Best Of The Web Today” (0)
- 05: “Diversity” Is As Diversity Does(n’t) (2)
- 05: “Diversity”: Multi-versity? Uni-versity? Per-versity! (4)
- 04: Medical Alert! (8)
- 03: DAMN BAMN: Double Standard Double Talk (1)
- 03: The Jury Is (In, Out, Non-Diverse)? (2)
- 01: Is Neutrality Possible In A System Of Preferences? (4)
- 01: Boffo Bashman! (0)
- 01: Jeffrey Rosen: A Brown-Defying, Meritocratic, Quota-Mongering Preference Pusher (7)
May 2003
- 31: Education Or Re-Education At UVa? (0)
- 30: The Market For (And Of) “Diversity” (1)
- 30: Whites, Men Lag In College Enrollment, Request Preferences and Subsidies (2)
- 29: Stigma: P = S2 (3)
- 29: Ethnic Economics (Ethnicomics?) (3)
- 26: “All The News That’s Fit To Print” … And Then Some (25)
- 26: Constitution and constitution (0)
- 26: “Diversity” Or Divisiveness? (13)
- 25: Democrats Oppose Hispanic Media Merger (1)
- 24: Pathetic (3)
- 24: “Diversity” … Discrimination … and the DISCRIMINATIONS Award For Originality (1)
- 22: “Diversity” And Viewpoint Discrimination (10)
- 22: Diversity Is As Diversity Does(n’t) (2)
- 21: BUSH ADMINISTRATION SAPS PREFERENCES (0)
- 21: There’s Nothing Like A Dame (1)
- 19: Strained Medicinal Metaphors (0)
- 19: Separate But Equal (Or Not) (5)
- 18: Hazardous Guesses (2)
- 18: Shipp Shape (1)
- 18: The Willie Horton Of Affirmative Action (0)
- 17: AA: Good But Unfair (0)
- 17: Reaction (Mine) To “Affirmative Action Reaction” (0)
- 17: Orthodox History And The Clinton Wars (0)
- 17: Biased Test Bias Study? (2)
- 15: If Diversity Here, Why Not Diversity There? (4)
- 15: Hollywood Colorblindness (Or Not) (8)
- 14: Propositions, Grammatical And Otherwise (11)
- 14: “Fetishization” At WaPo & TNR (4)
- 13: Hoist On Its Own Stigmatic Petard (0)
- 12: What’s In A Name? (4)
- 11: “Diversity” And Editorial Standards At The New York Times (4)
- 11: Coach Jackson (1)
- 10: DNC Opposes Bush Supreme Court Nominee(s)! (1)
- 09: Drabble Drivel (3)
- 09: Mulling Muller (1)
- 07: Pryor Convictions: Civil Rights, States Rights, Whose/Who’s Right? What’s Left? (2)
- 07: Kaus And Effect (1)
- 06: Racial Assignment (1)
- 06: Racial Profiling (Or Not?) (4)
- 06: O’Connor On (And Off) Affirmative Action (0)
- 05: States Rights! (4)
- 05: Odd Article (5)
- 01: Aw Schucks! Read This Article! (1)
April 2003
- 29: Lest We Forget (0)
- 29: Partisan Hypocrisy (0)
- 29: “The Diversity Paradox” Is Not A Paradox (0)
- 29: First
SexGender, Now Money! (2) - 29: Promoting Bigotry? (0)
- 29:
GirlsWomen Will Be … ? (5) - 29: Another Poll-ish Joke (0)
- 28: The Crackup Of Racial Redistricting (1)
- 28: Black Latinos (2)
- 27: The New York Times And The Politics Of Judicial Appointments (4)
- 26: Gray On Black And White (2)
- 26: By (Bye?) The Numbers (1)
- 26: Quotes Of The Week (0)
- 26: “Come As You Are,” Unless … (0)
- 25: Unexpected WSJ Article (1)
- 25: Did Michigan Fabricate Diversity Data? (0)
- 25: The Grandfather Of Affirmative Action (0)
- 24: Terrific Roger Clegg Column (0)
- 23: Princeton Historian James McPherson Defends Preferences (5)
- 22: “Affirming Exploitation” (5)
- 21: “Hobbesian Choice”? You Choose (2)
- 20: The Atkinson Diet (0)
- 20: Climbing Jacobs’ Ladder (3)
- 20: More On Does Diversity Work? (2)
- 18: Grades And Fairness (2)
- 17: Broder On Preferences (3)
- 16: A Washington Post Twofer (3)
- 14: Diversity Is As Diversity Does II (15)
- 14: Diversity Is As Diversity Does (3)
- 11: Unintended (But Predictable) Consequences (3)
- 11: Small School Diversity & Racial Regulation (8)
- 10: Republican Foot-in-Mouth Disease Provokes Tasty Toes Democratic Response (3)
- 10: Appalling Rall (9)
- 08: Virginia Tech Reverses Ban On Affirmative Action (Or Does It? See UPDATE) (2)
- 07: Muller Mulls Scalia On Michigan (0)
- 07: Diversity Discriminates Against Whites To … (0)
- 07: The Reasonable William Raspberry (2)
- 06: Observing Adam Cohen (6)
- 06: Go Dean! (0)
- 06: (Not Martin Luther) King (6)
- 05: Sub Judice … Finis (0)
- 05: Diversity? C’est Moi! (0)
- 04: Stanley Kurtz On Michigan (0)
- 04: The Return Of Sub Judice Redux: The Sequel (3)
- 04: Why Richard Cohen? (2)
- 03: Bollinger Agrees! (12)
- 02: Racial Privacy? The Right Says Yes, And No… (5)
- 02: The Return Of Sub Judice Redux (1)
- 02: TAP Dancing (0)
- 02: Sub Judice Redux (2)
- 02: More New York Times Inanity (7)
- 01: Oral Arguments In Grutter and Gratz (1)
- 01: Non-Discrimination(s) Personal Interest Story (0)
- 01: Downside Of Diversity (cont.) (4)
- 01: Sub Judice (0)
March 2003
- 31: Class, Not Race? No, Race Plus Class (0)
- 31: The Good Guys (0)
- 31: The New Jews (1)
- 31: Another Puff Piece For “Diversity” (2)
- 31: The Downside Of Diversity: “Hate Bias” At UVa (5)
- 30: Jessie In Philadelphia Inquirer! (3)
- 30: Race: One Among Many Factors? (10)
- 30: Affirmative Action: Establishment Darling (0)
- 30: Equality As Parity (0)
- 30: Glenn Loury And The Coming (?) Confederacy Of Races (2)
- 29: Diverse Paths To Diversity (0)
- 29: Reductio Ad (Even More) Absurdum (0)
- 29: Quota Un-Quota (2)
- 26: Preferential Hunches (0)
- 26: The Harvard Civil Rights Project Strikes Again (1)
- 25: DISCRIMINATIONS Hits The Road… (0)
- 25: Less Than Compelling Support For Preferences (0)
- 25: Michigan Articles in Today’s Chronicle of Higher Education (0)
- 23: Claude Steele,”Stereotype Threat,” And Racial Preference (9)
- 23: Reporting “Reporting Civil Rights” (1)
- 23: Thomas Friedman’s Qualifications (0)
- 22: Maybe Someone Can Explain… (7)
- 19: Peter Wood On Diversity (0)
- 19: Voices Of Sanity, And Otherwise, At UVa (7)
- 19: Opinion On War? The Washington Post vs. … The Washington Post (0)
- 18: More Today On Top X% Plans… (1)
- 18: Hitting The Road, Not The Books (1)
- 18: “‘Percent Plans’ Don’t Add Up” … To What? (2)
- 17: Does Diversity Work? (6)
- 17: On Lani Guinier On Preferences (3)
- 16: Experienced Workers Neeed Not Apply (1)
- 15: The Inscrutable Randall Kennedy (2)
- 14: Socioeconomic Disadvantage vs. Race (9)
- 14: Finally, Someone At UVa Criticizes Double Standards (0)
- 13: Meanwhile, At Virginia Tech… (4)
- 13: UVa: “Candlelight Vigil Gives Voice To Outrage” (1)
- 12: Virginia Tech Drops Consideration Of Race (0)
- 12: The Cavalier Daily On War And Peace (1)
- 12: Diversity Fervor Builds At UVa (7)
- 11: The Continuing Concern Over Hate Crimes And Diversity At Virginia (1)
- 11: Poetry Is To Politics As … (0)
- 11: Alleged Victim of UVa Hate Crime Attack Wins Race (3)
- 11: University of Michigan Diversifies Its Faculty (0)
- 11: Iowa State Abandons Segregated Program (1)
- 09: Does Subtraction = Addition? (1)
- 09: No Diversity In Diversity’s Back Yard (0)
- 08: High Noon (2)
- 07: Alleged Hate Crime at UVa (Continuing…) (2)
- 06: Who’s Jealous? (2)
- 06: A Little Quiz (0)
- 06: Do Preferentialists Prefer Plessy? (4)
- 05: Alleged Hate Crime At UVa (cont.) (4)
- 05: Democrats, Diversity, And (Who Else?) Al Sharpton (2)
- 05: Colleges Defend Racial Exclusion (7)
- 04: Washington Post Poll On War: Headline/Text vs. Data? (1)
- 04: Democrats Hang Together … Or Separately (0)
- 03: … And Now Some Numbers From UVa, As Filtered Through The Washington Post (2)
- 03: Michigan By The Numbers (cont.) (1)
- 03: Michigan By The Numbers (6)
- 02: Great One-Liner From Colin Powell (20)
- 02: Cynical Ideologues (0)
- 02: Justification For Preferences? C’est Moi! (8)
- 01: Tunnel Vision (0)
- 01: Hate Crimes And Double Standards In Charlottesville (6)
February 2003
- 28: The French Hide Their Flag (8)
- 28: Dear Senator Graham… (1)
- 28: An Expert Speaks (5)
- 28: Dahlia Dumps On the Pro- And Anti-Estrada Arguments (3)
- 27: Brainless Busing, Dumb Quota (0)
- 27: Black Judges At Stanford (0)
- 27: Hijacking The Affirmative Action Movement (0)
- 27: Prefereces Today, Preferences Tomorrow, Preferences Forever! (2)
- 27: Atmosphere? (0)
- 26: Man Bites Dog! Civil Rights Lawyers Applaud Supreme Court Insistence On Racial Neutrality (0)
- 26: Making A Federal Case Of It (1)
- 26: Slots At The Races & Race At The Slots (0)
- 26: Home Again (0)
- 24: Estrada Vote Scheduled In Washington… (0)
- 24: Stanford Says Narrow Michigan Ruling Would Have No Effect (1)
- 24: Affirmative Action Analogies (0)
- 24: Buckeye Bull (0)
- 24: The American Jewish Committee Opposes Quotas, Supports Michigan (0)
- 24: “A Broad National Consensus” On ….? (0)
- 24: General Isolationism Or Isolated Isolationism? (0)
- 23: The World According To The San Francisco Chronicle (1)
- 23: Martin Luther King Opposes War In Iraq … Again (0)
- 23: Opposing Estrada Because He’s Hispanic (Cont.) (0)
- 23: Congrats to Jennifer Gratz (13)
- 21: Tooth Paste Politics (0)
- 21: Another Invidious Ubiquitous Non Sequitur (IUNS) (2)
- 21: “Appearances Reflective Of Society” (0)
- 20: Martin Luther King Opposes War In Iraq (6)
- 20: Stanford And Bay Area Quotes Of Note (0)
- 20: Opposing Estrada Because He’s Hispanic (Cont.) (1)
- 20: The Dog That Did Not Bark At Stanford And MIT (0)
- 19: The Issue is Double (Triple…) Standards (1)
- 19: Lani Guinier: “The ‘Quota’ Smokescreen” Queen (0)
- 18: A Jury Of One’s Peers? (0)
- 18: Crazy Asians (4)
- 18: All Diversity All The Time (0)
- 17: Go Navy! (1)
- 17: Love And Diversity (1)
- 17: Legacies, Race Preferences, And Fairness (1)
- 17: Are The Democrats Opposing Estrada Because He’s Hispanic? (2)
- 17: More On
Quotas“Workforce Parity Benchmarks” (0) - 17: Quote “Quota!” Unquote (0)
- 17: More Destroying The Village In Order To Save It (0)
- 17: Even At Duke! (0)
- 17: We’re Back! (4)
- 11: Regulating The Racial Market (1)
- 11: Big Business And Race Preferences (4)
- 11: A Misleading (And A Missing) Washington Post Headline (1)
- 11: MIT Abandons Its Race-Exclusive Programs (0)
- 11: Race Conscious v. Race Preference (1)
- 10: Racial Non-Profiling In Colorado (1)
- 10: A One-Way Conversation On Race At Duke (3)
- 10: Michigan Leads With Its Chin (0)
- 09: LA Times Headlines On War At War With Each Other And With Text (1)
- 09: Worry Warts (3)
- 08: FindLaw Finds Fault (0)
- 08: Good Advice + Good News For The Delaware Deceased (2)
- 08: Raining Cats and Peaceniks (0)
- 07: Princeton Ends A Preference Program; MIT Changes Its Spots (3)
- 07: The Real Reasons For Opposing Estrada? (2)
- 06: Bush Gains Support In War On Preferences (0)
- 06: “Ethnic Correctness”: More Diversity Perversity (3)
- 05: Ohio To Reconsider Rejection Of 14th Amendment (1)
- 05: Two Must See Articles In The Weekly Standard (2)
- 05: Fish Tales (7)
- 04: 100 More Years Of Preferences? (0)
- 04: Michigan And Rice Redux (0)
- 04: Preferences For (Not In) The Military (2)
- 04: The Sound Of A True Political Junkie (0)
- 04: Republican Fear Of Attacking Preferences (0)
- 03: Quote Of The Day (3)
- 03: Affirmative Action In The NFL (0)
- 03: Another Father-Daughter Combo! (0)
- 02: The U.N. View Of Discrimination (8)
- 02: An Overly Optimistic Lament About Education (5)
- 02: Who Says What Is “Realistic”? (0)
- 02: The New York Times On Diversity: Clear Numbers Shrouded In Obfuscation (11)
- 01: Who’d A Thunk? (0)
- 01: Page Out Of The Preference Book (7)
- 01: Black Studies And The National Character (6)
- 01: Saturday Morning Musings On Diversity (2)
January 2003
- 31: “Diversity” Narrows The Liberal Mind (Or Vice Versa) (0)
- 31: Colorblindness Is A Blank SLATE (3)
- 31: Surprise! (Not): AA Bias in the New York Times (1)
- 30: From The Sublime To The Ridiculous (0)
- 30: Republicans Lead With Their Chin (0)
- 30: Democratic Desire For Diversity Stops At The Party’s Edge (2)
- 30: The Sky Would Fall (0)
- 30: Attacking Iraq is… Racist? (6)
- 29: Secret Weapon Against Saddam! (0)
- 29: Brief Brief Excerpt 2: Michigan Association of Scholars (4)
- 28: Brief Brief Excerpt 1: A Bunch Of Law Professors (1)
- 28: “When Women’s Colleges Sell Diversity, It’s A Con” (0)
- 28: The Fate Of AA At Private Colleges (7)
- 27: If Diversity Is Compelling… (3)
- 27: Diversity Is As Diversity Does (Or Is It?) (0)
- 27: “The Unintended Consequences Of Affirmative Action” (2)
- 26: Creating Diversity Without Discrimination (6)
- 26: Another Curious Criticism of “Race Blind” (0)
- 26: IUNS In The New Republic (3)
- 26: Quotas As Red Herring (1)
- 25: “Mixed Signals” Or Press Bias? Release 2.0 (0)
- 24: On (And Off) Affirmative Action With Lieberman & Kerry (3)
- 24: Quotas Are Alive And Well, Though Struggling (2)
- 24: Looking Into The Teeth Of The Preferences Argument (13)
- 24: Bush Rescuing Affirmative Action? (0)
- 23: Polls: Public Opposes Preferences (4)
- 23: Jack’s Back! (2)
- 22: Lee Bollinger On Diversity (5)
- 21: Kleiman On Preferences (11)
- 21: The Civil War … Then And Now (2)
- 21: Schools “Resegregate”? Diversity And Busing (14)
- 21: Taking Exception To “Exceptions” (1)
- 20: Kinsley’s Invidious Ubiquitous Non Sequitur (5)
- 20: Michigan AA Plaintiff Counsel Comments (0)
- 20: It’s The Pitts (1)
- 20: More Road Kill: Yet Another IUNS (1)
- 20: Road Kill (0)
- 19: Race, Religion, And The Continuing WaPo Pile On (0)
- 19: The Washington Post: Dishonest On Diversity (1)
- 19: IUNS (Invidious Ubiquitous Non Sequiturs) In the Washington Post (0)
- 19: What Is A Compelling State Interest? (0)
- 19: Interesting Criticism (0)
- 19: Thomas Oliphant (Or Is It Oh-I-Rant?) Column (0)
- 19: Yet Another “Me!” Defense Of Affirmative Action (3)
- 18: Balking At Balkin On Colorblindness (10)
- 17: Affirmative Action As Spoils Of War (1)
- 17: We Told You So (1)
- 17: Another Invidious Ubiquitous Non Sequitur (2)
- 17: Quotes Of Note (1)
- 17: Solicitor General’s Briefs in Michigan AA Cases: Narrowly Tailored (2)
- 17: Giving Quotas A Facial (6)
- 16: Does Colorblind = Oblivious? (Obliviously Not!) (3)
- 15: “Mixed Signals” Or Press Bias? (1)
- 14: White House To Oppose Racial Preferences! (1)
- 14: Mythtaken (6)
- 14: Welcome To Balkinization (0)
- 12: A Speech For President Bush (3)
- 12: 35 Higher Education Organiazations Repeat Diversity Fallacy (7)
- 12: New Blog Discusses Michigan AA Cases (0)
- 11: Will Bush Weigh In On Michigan? AP Reports Rumor, Screws Up Facts (0)
- 10: White House Press Briefing (6)
- 10: Symposium On White Nationalism (0)
- 10: An Interesting Perspective From the BSU At Eastern Michigan U. (2)
- 10: White House To Stay Out of Michigan Case? (0)
- 10: White House Hair-Tearing Over Michigan Case (0)
- 10: Another “ME!” Defense of Racial Preferences (7)
- 09: Another Off-Base Columnist Parses Plessy Poorly (1)
- 08: Impressive Article Re Extreme Preferences At Indiana U. (5)
- 08: Martin Luther King And Affirmative Action (1)
- 08: Very Odd AAUP Study Of Affirmative Action (2)
- 07: Three Cheers For Richard Cohen (2)
- 06: Non-Legacy Preferences For “Regular People”? (0)
- 06: There It (the New York Times) Goes Again… (4)
- 05: Affirmative Action For Muslims? (3)
- 05: Snide, Obnoxious New York Times Article On Affirmative Action. So What Else Is New… (4)
- 05: Less v. Fewer + Double Standard (0)
- 04: Making Not-Quite-So-Clean A Brest Of It: Former Stanford Law Dean Defends Diversity (2)
- 03: Diversity And School Transfers: Diversity For Whom? (4)
- 01: An Argument For Affirmative Action: Me (4)
- 01: Segregation: In Politics And Publishing (1)
Recent Comments