December 2007
- 30: Further? (11)
- 27: Merit, Class, Race (5)
- 26: Hillary’s Experience … And Some Plame For Bill? (1)
- 26: UPDATE (0)
- 26: All You Need To Know About The Democrats… (5)
- 25: “White Guys Have No Rights. And They’d Better Shut Up If They Think They Have” (5)
- 25: The Press Dog That Didn’t Bark… (1)
- 24: What Is A “Race Card,” And Who’s Playing It? (1)
- 24: Disparities (0)
- 23: Must Police Be Representative? Whom Do They Represent? (9)
- 22: “Diversity” And “Underrepresentation” (12)
- 20: Anti-Conservative Bias In Wash. Post News Article (10)
- 20: “Economic Apartheid” In Philadelphia? (3)
- 19: Surprise (Not)! Preferences Produce Animosity (11)
- 17: The Only Gov’t Program Ashamed Of Itself… (2)
- 17: Flexible “Principles” At The Univ. Of Michigan Law School (0)
- 17: UC: A Broader But Shallower Pool? (1)
- 17: Quotahoma (1)
- 14: “Because She Is A Woman” (5)
- 11: Lack Of Law Firm “Diversity” Blamed On US News and World Report (55)
- 10: Conventional (Un)Wisdom (1)
- 08: A Merit-less Comment About Merit In The NYT (2)
- 07: Arizona Programs Threatened By Equality (19)
- 06: Is Being Saved By A “Diverse” Fireman Important? (3)
- 06: Does “Diversity” Make Students Smarter? (1)
- 04: How DARE Stanford? (2)
- 04: Iowa In Brown, Black, And Pink (0)
- 02: UPDATE! (1)
- 01: An Early Sighting Of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (0)
November 2007
- 30: New Zealand, The Maori, And The Non-Sequitur Of The Day (8)
- 30: Another “Underrepresented” Group At Berkeley: Americans (2)
- 30: Obama’s Color Lines (0)
- 29: Liberal Lawyers Try To “Diversify” Profession (0)
- 28: Is Legal Status An Impermissible “Non-Academic Criterion”? (2)
- 28: Episcopalians, “White Privilege,” And A Progressive “Privilege” Tax (0)
- 27: Asian Discrimination Gave Birth To Civil Rights Initiatives (4)
- 27: Heretical North Carolina Democrat! (0)
- 26: Asians: A Convenient Minority (2)
- 25: Two Institutions Done In By “Diversity” (0)
- 24: Iraq War Causes Illegal Immigration (?) (3)
- 24: The Dog That Didn’t Bar[ac]k (1)
- 23: A New “Yellow Peril” (43)
- 23: Quotas: Our Leading Export (0)
- 22: Hard Feelings Forged At Black Smith (14)
- 21: It’s Hard To Argue Against Equality… (1)
- 21: A Conservative Giving Thanks (0)
- 19: What About The Assimilation Of Citizens? (23)
- 17: Gutter Arguments (1)
- 16: UPDATE (0)
- 15: Consensus? (2)
- 15: UVa’s “Fall Fling”: Is Separate “Inherently Unequal”? (4)
- 15: Racial Politics (0)
- 15: If Blacks Are Not A “Single Race” … (2)
- 15: The Supe Is Nuts: Just When You Thought California Schools Couldn’t Get Any Worse… (7)
- 13: Quotas For Partnerships (5)
- 13: “Diversity”-Speak In Missouri: We’re All Diverse… (0)
- 12: UPDATE (0)
- 12: Obama Forthrightly Opposes, Then Forthrightly Supports, Affirmative Action (5)
- 11: Is Arizona Different? (1)
- 11: Scientists Worry That Race Is Real (0)
- 11: Wilson On Putnam On Diversity (1)
- 10: Comer On Affirmative Action (0)
- 09: Does Bowdoin Practice Affirmative Action? (4)
- 08: Diversiphiles Oppose Research On “Diversity” (10)
- 08: Objective Vs. Subjective Admissions Standards (3)
- 08: Stigma (1)
- 07: “Diversity”? Just More Of The Same… (0)
- 05: Un-News, Or Perhaps Anti-News, From The Detroit News (5)
- 05: Watershed(s)? (9)
- 01: Why Should Science Be “Diverse”? (6)
October 2007
- 29:
BlackDiverse Issues (6) - 27: Arizona: An Initiative Barring Consideration Of “Social Factors”? (4)
- 27: Shelby Steele On Obama … And Others (27)
- 26: Iowa Governor Decrees “Diversity” (7)
- 26: Oregon Responds To “Diversity” Critic: “Shhh” (4)
- 26: Group of 88 Leader Chastises Cosby (0)
- 26: Hypocrisy (Continued, And Continuing) (2)
- 25: “Diversity,” Visible And Invisible (2)
- 25: Noose-ance News (4)
- 25: Towson U. Drops Preferential Admissions For Underrepresented Minority Students (1)
- 24: “On The Lookout” … For The Obvious (0)
- 23: Is Discrimination “Different”? (2)
- 23: “The Delusive Concept Of Diversity” (1)
- 23: Impact Of Prop. 209 (0)
- 22: UPDATE (1)
- 22: “Diverse” Classrooms? (0)
- 20: Limbaugh, Democrats, Decency, And “Petty Bickering” (11)
- 20: A “Demographic Gap”? (5)
- 19: Skirting Prop. 2 (5)
- 18: Will ENDA End Sexual Orientation Discrimination? (9)
- 18: People As Canaries (11)
- 18: Automated Affirmative Action (2)
- 17: Asian American Freshmen: Social Science Or Special Pleading? (2)
- 16: Does Colorblind Equality Cause Population Loss? (5)
- 15: More Hypocrisy (0)
- 15: “Associational Preference” And The Rationale For “Diversity” (3)
- 13: Help? (0)
- 13: UPDATE (0)
- 12: More Missouri Misconduct (1)
- 12: Is Colorblind Equality Xenophobic? (2)
- 12: Supreme Court Opinions Actually Have Effects! (0)
- 11: What Do New Jerseyans Look Like … And Should Anyone Care? (3)
- 10: Are State Bars Barred From Discriminating? (0)
- 10: Deception? (3)
- 09: Black Diversity (2)
- 09: Are Africans “Diverse”? Not In Missouri… (1)
- 08: The Lack Of Diversity In Academia (2)
- 08: Confused In Arizona (1)
- 08: Man Bites Dog: AA Officer Warns The Politically Correct… (0)
- 08: “Diversity” As Normal, Or Not (2)
- 07: What’s The Difference Between “Diversity Goals” And “Quotas”? (0)
- 05: Michigan Looks Backward … And Forward (1)
- 04: “Diversity” … Or Silence? (6)
- 02: Mainstream Media Muck In Missouri (2)
- 02: Sauce For The Goose? Glass House Rock Thrower? (55)
- 02: You Say Toledo, I Say … Good Article! (0)
- 02: University of Chicago Admissions Dean: Fake, Flake, Or Flack? (6)
- 01: Skirting The Issue … (1)
September 2007
- 30: UPDATE(S) (0)
- 30: Is Orlando Patterson Channeling Roger Clegg? (3)
- 28: A Love Sonnet To UCLA In The New York Times (9)
- 27: “Diversity” Quote Of The Day (3)
- 26: “Why Diversity For Diversity’s Sake Won’t Work” (2)
- 26: No Quotas In Minneapolis? Why Not? (0)
- 24: Roger Clegg On Jena (34)
- 23: Greenspan Cheats (10)
- 20: UPDATE! (0)
- 20: And You Thought Bilingual Education Was Bad (0)
- 20: Persistent Racism In Universities (3)
- 20: Asians: The New Whites (3)
- 20: The University As A Representative Institution (2)
- 19: “Affirmative Action” In An Obituary (3)
- 19: From Inane To Sublime To Ridiculous (4)
- 18: Inanity (1)
- 17: If Majority-Minority Voting Districts Are Good, Why Are Majority-Minority School Districts Bad? (0)
- 17: UPDATE (0)
- 16: The Los Angeles Times On Racial School Assignments (7)
- 16: Non-Denial Denials From Oklahoma (0)
- 15: Voting Rights And Wrongs (0)
- 14: Hate Crime And “Cultural Separatism” (3)
- 14: Marian Wright Edelman Is Wrong (1)
- 14: Balancing Act: Jewish Fraternity Denied Official Recognition (1)
- 13: Interesting Rationale For “Balance” (7)
- 13: A New Report … And A New Verb (1)
- 13: The “Diversity” Dilemma (1)
- 12: Multiple Choice Prevents “Diversity” (1)
- 12: “Diversity” And Poetic Justice (4)
- 11: Short-Changed (5)
- 08: No Joke (20)
- 08: Behind (Formerly) Closed Doors… (2)
- 07: Photo IDs: The New Jim Crow? (0)
- 07: MIT Dept. of Urban Studies & Planning Discriminates Against Foreign Students (And Others) (4)
- 06: Spelman President Calls All Whites Racist (41)
- 05: Colorado Misrepresentation Mimics Michigan Misrepresentation (13)
- 04: NAACP At The Crossroads? (1)
- 03: What Am I Missing? (2)
- 03: Mexicans: White? Black? Red? (1)
August 2007
- 29: An American Soldier Writes… (10)
- 27: Civil Rights Commission Urges Law Schools To Release Data [This Post Has Been UPDATED … and UPDATED Again] (6)
- 27: Neutrality? For It? Against It? Both? (2)
- 27: “Misconstrued”???? (11)
- 27: Exporting “American-Style” Affirmative Action II (32)
- 27: Exporting “American-Style” Affirmative Action (2)
- 25: UPDATE (0)
- 24: Attempting To Prevent Diversity in Debate Over “Diversity” (6)
- 23: UPDATE (0)
- 23: Some Interesting News From Sociology (0)
- 23: Would-Be Teachers (And Others) Fail Tests (3)
- 23: Does Preferential Treatment Violate A Ban On Preferential Treatment? (2)
- 22: “When Loving Parents Choose Segregation” (25)
- 22: Rigid Racial Balance At Risk? (2)
- 21: Outrageous Official Misconduct In Missouri II (1)
- 21: “… Affirmative Action Is Government-Sanctioned Racism” (14)
- 20: “How do you classify a previously white, slightly Chinese-looking African?” (2)
- 19: Historical Brown-Out (19)
- 16: Baiting The Hook (4)
- 15: Thank Goodness For Sociologists (And Their Sycophantic Reporters) (3)
- 15: Heads Up! New Comment Policy (7)
- 10: Should Courts Defer To Local Schools And Their Social Science? (24)
- 10: “How Do Liberals And Progress [sic] Think … About Discrimination?” (9)
- 09: Another Social Scientist Tells Us We’re All Racist … And What To Do About It (3)
- 09: White Tribes And The “Wrong Kind Of White” (0)
- 08: Hate Speech For Horses? (4)
- 08: Surprise! Better Students More Likely to Graduate! (1)
- 07: Does Equality Hurt Women? No (5)
- 05: Isolated In The Ivory Tower (3)
- 05: More “Diversity,” Double Standards, Doublespeak (17)
- 05: Ver. 2.0: Does “Diversity” Turn People Into Turtles? (0)
- 04: Disadvantaged? (0)
- 04: Is This The Best They Can Do? (31)
- 04: Lesson (Glimpse Of The Future?) From Abroad (1)
- 03: Clouds Over The Rainbow (2)
- 03: Gays “Underrepresented” Among College Presidents (5)
- 02: Sound Familiar? (6)
- 02: Caltrans Requests Permission To Use
QuotaGoal (12) - 02: Texas Complaints Pile Up (0)
July 2007
- 31: Robinson The Egalitarian (10)
- 30: Missouri UPDATE (0)
- 30: “Framing” Redux Redux (3)
- 29: Is This “Frame” Slanted? (1)
- 28: Wisconsin Racial Discrimination Not A “Test” (3)
- 28: The Missouri Press: Self-Censorship Or Merely Asleep At The Switch? (33)
- 26: Discrimination … But Against Whom? (3)
- 26: Outrageous Official Misconduct In Missouri (29)
- 25: EXTRA! EXTRA! Congress Moves To Eliminate Race Preferences! (0)
- 24: Does Edwards, Do All Democrats, Also Reject Preferences? (5)
- 22: The Politics And Principle (Or Not) Of Race Preference (15)
- 21: Affirmative Action As Expiation Of White Guilt (46)
- 21: Michigan Democrats Oppose Photo Voter ID (0)
- 21: Endorsement Of Racial Neutrality From An Unlikely Source (1)
- 21: What Is “Their Share?” (0)
- 21: The Economic Benefits Of Diversity (Or Not) (2)
- 17: Some Wisdom From Missouri (1)
- 17: Colorblindness Comes To Michigan … Sort Of (0)
- 11: Continued Light Blogging: Ward Connerly’s Fault (3)
- 11: Cultural Conflict At Historically Black Colleges (10)
- 10: “Framing” Redux (1)
- 08: Liberals And The “Vision” Thing (5)
- 08: “One Cannot Cure Gangrene With Lavender Water” (0)
- 07: Birgeneau Redux (1)
- 07: Snippy, Snippy (1)
- 07: Salzman: A Challenged Rocky Columnist (2)
- 07: Spotty Blogging, Gay Equality, Etc. (4)
- 03: Seattle/Louisville: From The Sublime To The Ridiculous (21)
- 03: Chutzpah! (31)
June 2007
- 29: There Will Be A Brief Delay … (1)
- 28: Yes! (41)
- 27: News: Tattoos? Who Knew… (2)
- 27: Upside Down Brown (1)
- 27: Racial Preference Can Be Deadly (3)
- 26: Glaring Lack Of “Diversity” In Women’s Sports (11)
- 25: Telling It Like It (Mostly) Is (6)
- 25: Righting What Wrongs? (0)
- 24: The Sky-Is-Falling Chorus Starts Up In Colorado (1)
- 24: Lott Of Hot Air (0)
- 24: Speech Police To Insure “Correct Reporting”? (0)
- 23: Profile In Courage … Or Maybe Vote-Counting (0)
- 23: CCRI Headed For The Ballot (0)
- 23: Another Driver-By Attack On Equality (3)
- 22: Preferences For (Formerly) Illegal Immigrants III (1)
- 22: Does “Diversity” Turn People Into Turtles? (4)
- 22: More Expert Opinion… (1)
- 21: “Role Model Nonsense” (1)
- 21: Sauce For The Goose Leads To … A Cooked Goose (0)
- 21: Another “Diversity” Attack On The First Amendment (4)
- 20: The Color Of Talent (0)
- 20: Half True, Wholly Distorted (24)
- 20: Missing The (Grade-) Point (0)
- 17: An Open Letter To George Allen, Virgil Goode, Steve Landes (1)
- 16: Now We Owe Them… (6)
- 15: “Preposterous” Identity Group Graduations At UCLA (1)
- 15: Post-Prop. 2 Michigan Law Admissions (8)
- 15: Preferences For (Formerly) Illegal Immigrants II (0)
- 15: Guest Post By Roger Clegg (1)
- 14: History Lesson (0)
- 14: Is It Racist To Oppose Vote Fraud? (5)
- 13: University Of California Admissions Statistics (18)
- 13: Preferentialists Hoist On Their Own Petard (2)
- 11: Double Standards On “Diversity” (18)
- 11: Conservatives Debate Immigration (And Each Other) (13)
- 10: “Gay Lawyers … Demand More Diversity” (7)
- 08: Plans, Principles, Preferences (5)
- 08: Preferential Treatment For The (Formerly?) Illegal Immigrants (6)
- 07: Colorado Civil Rights Initiative Clears One Hurdle (26)
- 05: A Good Example Of The Irrelevance Of “Diversity” (12)
- 05: Setback In Wisconsin (4)
- 05: Indian Givers II (3)
- 04: The Uniformity Of “Diversity” (1)
- 04: The Impact of MCRI (1)
- 04: Can Same-Sex Couples “Co-Habit” In Virginia? (2)
- 04: Ridiculous Racial Rationale (10)
- 01: Indian Givers… (0)
- 01: The Changing Face Of American Medicine (0)
- 01: Women, Minorities Show Continued Gains… (1)
- 01: Principles vs. Platitudes In The Diversity Debate (19)
May 2007
- 31: Will’s Way With Words (1)
- 31: Revealing View Of Affirmative Action From the Eighth Circuit (0)
- 31: But Who’s Counting? (3)
- 30: Dartmouth “Diversity” (2)
- 28: Gates Joins Obama, Substitutes (Adds?) Class For (To?) Race (2)
- 27: The Measure Of Preference, At UCLA And Elsewhere (8)
- 24: Only In California? (Probably Not…) (0)
- 24: Pew: Disingenuous (Dishonest?) Survey Report (12)
- 20: Left Vs. Right On The Role/Rule Of Law (2)
- 18: Do Minorities Deserve Preferences Regardless Of Their Numbers? (0)
- 18: Harvard: Fair Or Foul? (0)
- 18: An Exchange On Evil Republicans And “Diversity” (31)
- 17: “Diverse” Disparities At UC Santa Cruz (5)
- 17: “Resegregation?” Yeah, Right… (2)
- 16: Calling Out “Diversity” Doublespeak (2)
- 16: Here’s To You, Mr. Robinson… (0)
- 15: Kindergarten Kwotas? (1)
- 15: Keeping Obama On The Reservation (1)
- 13: Obama On (Or Off?) Affirmative Action (3)
- 12: Woe Is Wilmington (0)
- 12: Who Would Satirize “Diversity”? Peter Wood Would (1)
- 12: Affirmative Action In Baseball … And Real Life (1)
- 12: Is Affirmative Action A Remedy For Apartheid? (2)
- 11: Boston’s Diverse Diversity (1)
- 11: CSU Chancellor Loudly Flouts Prop. 209 (2)
- 11: Interesting Debate Over Interest (0)
- 10: The Christian Science Monitor Warns Of New Race Initiatives (5)
- 10: Good News From Missouri (8)
- 10: When Will San Francisco Secede? (0)
- 08: Are AP Scores Determined By Objective Or Subjective Criteria? (10)
- 08: Dropouts (5)
- 07: Citing George Washington Violates EEO Policy! (14)
- 06: “Discrimination, The ‘Good’ Kind”? (7)
- 05: Decade Of Race-Blind Admissions At UC (13)
- 05: “Diverse” Lasagna In Las Vegas (1)
- 04: Surprise! “Diversity Training” Doesn’t Work (16)
- 04: The Democrats On Race … Then And Now (0)
- 04: A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Change… (1)
- 04: Jesse Jackson: Congress Should Reverse Upcoming Schools Decision (4)
- 03: Misunderstanding “Misunderstanding” In Colorado (6)
- 02: When Are Quotas Not Quotas? When The Democrats Require Them (5)
- 01: A Dimly Shining Star (2)
- 01: Los Angeles Times Confused (This Is News?…) (1)
April 2007
- 30: Clueless In Seattle (6)
- 30: “Diversity” Chickens Come Home To Roost (7)
- 29: “Diversity” = Proportional Representation (5)
- 28: Tempe Tantrums (0)
- 27: The Season Of Equality (5)
- 27: The Transmogrification Of Affirmative Action (22)
- 27: Did The Seattle School System Misuse Federal Funds? (2)
- 26: Arizona And Oklahoma (8)
- 26: Can Coloradans Think For Themselves? (40)
- 26: Colorado Obfuscation 2 (0)
- 26: Nikki Giovanni, “Potty Mouth” (3)
- 25: Missouri Civil Rights Initiative! (2)
- 24: Full Disclosure + Missouri + Arizona (12)
- 24: Colorado: The Obfuscation And Confusion Begin (0)
- 24: An April Fool’s Joke? No, “Social Science” (3)
- 23: UPDATE (0)
- 23: The Democrats’ Weak Reid (3)
- 23: Heart-Gazing Interpretation (0)
- 23: Black College Boosters Oppose Affirmative Action (12)
- 23: EXTRA! Colorado Civil Rights Initiative Announced! (14)
- 22: Chopp Shop Update (0)
- 22: Diversity In Baseball? (2)
- 21: Headline Of The Week (2)
- 21: “Diversity” At La Crosse (2)
- 21: Lift This Burden! (0)
- 20: Justice Ginsburg, Feminism, And Grutter (1)
- 19: Diversity, Professional Disposition, And Mental Hygiene (27)
- 19: Colorado: Half-Baked Idea Of Dialog (1)
- 19: Chopp Shop: Colgate U. Wants More Color, Less “Subfield Coverage” (1)
- 18: Univ. Of Michigan’s Lawyer Asks Court To Reconsider… (0)
- 18: Great Question Regarding Academic Freedom (0)
- 18: Attempt To “Derecognize” Republicans At University Of Rhode Island (2)
- 16: Opposing Affirmative Action: A Firing Offense? (3)
- 16: More Grounds For Optimism + Quote Of The Week (3)
- 15: Who Is Hispanic? (1)
- 14: PBS, Ken Burns, And Latino Vets: “Exclusion” Or “Mere Affirmative Action”? (1)
- 13: Weep For Beverly Hills High School: UPDATE II (0)
- 12: Brown-Out: “Diversity,” Inclusion, Segregation, Discrimination (4)
- 12: Imus Be Missing Something… (8)
- 10: Treated Unfairly? “Look At The Bigger Picture” (6)
- 10: Michigan End Run II … Blocked (For Now) (11)
- 10: HBCUs Are Not Inclusive. Must They Be? (0)
- 09: Grounds For Optimism: Sandra Day O’Connor Is Pessimistic! (3)
- 08: Weep For Beverly Hills High School: UPDATE (3)
- 07: Preferences Harm “Beneficiaries”: UPDATE (0)
- 06: Surprise! “Holistic” Review Helps Blacks & Hispanics, Hurts Whites & Asians (3)
- 04: An Unwitting Demand For Colorblindness (7)
- 04: Michigan End Run I (4)
- 02: Weep For Beverly Hills High: Too Many Good (Asian) Students (25)
- 01: “Solely On The Basis Of Race”? (3)
- 01: A New ERA, But What Does “Equality Of Rights” Mean? (0)
March 2007
- 31: A New Twist On Equality Of Opportunity (2)
- 29: Why Should Racial Preferences Be Eliminated In A State That Rarely Uses Them? (3)
- 26: UPDATE (3)
- 26: Preferences Harm “Beneficiaries ” (18)
- 24: College Board Urges Colleges To “ Gird For Fight” On Affirmative Action (14)
- 22: Special Aid For Muslim Students? (5)
- 21: A New Generation Of Conservative Leadership: Jennifer Gratz (44)
- 19: Defining Deviancy Down / Defining Civil Rights Up (3)
- 19: Racial Preference In South Africa: “To BEE Or Not To BEE” (0)
- 19: Affirmative Action Whistleblower Vindicated (4)
- 18: We’re Sorry (Aren’t We?) (22)
- 18: “Left Behind By The Civil Rights Revolution”? (6)
- 18: Race Is “No Big Deal”… (9)
- 17: Millions To Diversify Historically Black Colleges: Jackpot Or Crackpot? (2)
- 16: Read This Letter! (0)
- 16: Daily Princetonian Calls For More “Racial Precision” (15)
- 15: Is There A Right To Bare Arms? (3)
- 13: “Affirmative Action On The Ropes” (9)
- 13: Weird Discrimination Claims Dis Purported Victims (5)
- 13: Egregious Media Bias At InsideHigherEd (3)
- 12: Race An “Extenuating Circumstance” In “Overcoming Diversity”! (7)
- 12: Hillary’s Historical Revisionsm II (1)
- 08: The Michigan Civil Rights Commission Strikes (Out) Again (4)
- 07: The New York Times,The Nation, et. al. Were Right! (8)
- 06: So That’s What Affirmative Action Is (1)
- 06: “Diversity” Is Un-American (2)
- 05: Hillary’s Historical Revisionism (2)
- 04: “Diversity” May Or May Not Have Payoffs, But It Pays Well… (0)
- 04: “Civil Rights” vs. “Black Votes” (0)
- 01: Simon Says … More Prop. 2 Fallout (0)
February 2007
- 28: Race-Based Test Pep (0)
- 28: Pretty Good … For A Girl (0)
- 28: Racism, Sexism Fade, But … (1)
- 27: How Others See Us (How We Are?) (0)
- 27: “Multiculturalism Is A Racism Of The Anti-Racists” … (0)
- 27: Why People Oppose “Affirmative Action” (0)
- 26: A Civil Rights Lesson You Can Take To The Bank (0)
- 26: Clintonian Speech Code? (0)
- 26: Another Beneficiary Of Prop. 2: Yale! (0)
- 26: A Hate Crime Occurred, But Who Was The Victim? (6)
- 25: Another “Diversity Is Good Because It Was Good For Me…” (1)
- 25: Another “Victim” Of Prop. 2, Another Pathetic Edit (5)
- 24: Another Shallow “If Martin Luther King Were Alive Today” (2)
- 23: Man Bites Dog: Firm Fined For Affirmative Action Violations (1)
- 23: Race Preferences Create A Constituency … For Race Preferences (0)
- 22: Comment From President Of Seattle Parents’ Group (0)
- 20: Stanford Pays To Attract “Diverse” Grad Students (2)
- 20: Presidential Candidates: “Diversity” vs. Diversity (1)
- 19: Is “Diversity” Good For Business? Who Cares? (1)
- 19: More On The Immediate, Dramatic Effect Of Prop. 2 (5)
- 19: Obama’s Mama V (0)
- 18: Discrimination Against Women At Brown? (0)
- 18: Too Few “Gifted” Minorities; ACLU Threatens To Sue… (3)
- 18: UPDATE Re The Meaning Of Brown (0)
- 18: What Does “Solely On The Basis Of Race” Mean? (1)
- 17: Michigan’s Last Mighty Push For Racial Preference (0)
- 16: Obama’s Mama IV (1)
- 16: Mich. AG “Lashes Out” At Mich. Gov. For Avoiding Prop. 2 (0)
- 16: UPDATES To “Reductionism Ad Absurdam” (0)
- 16: Berry: Black History (0)
- 15: Does Prop. 2 Bar Preferences Based On Nationality? (0)
- 15: $254,000 Judgment To Hispanic Cop Because He Was “Not Black” (0)
- 15: UVa Admin To Departments: “I’m From The Diversity Office, And I’m Here To Help You…” (1)
- 14: Another Racially Exclusive Program Bites The Dust (1)
- 14: Can A Public University “Partner” With A Private Group That Discriminates? (0)
- 14: Pro-Affirmative Action But Anti-Penalty Against Asians? (0)
- 14: Is Discrimination Discrimination? (2)
- 13: Must We “Dismantle” “Perceived Barriers”? (2)
- 12: Another Hopeful Note On Obama (0)
- 12: Madison: Multiculturalism Or Racial Conformity? (0)
- 12: Draft ’Em! (0)
- 12: A Bare Majority Of Brown Univ. Students Supports Afirmative Action (0)
- 12: Why Is “Diversity” Good? Because The Supreme Cout Said So! (0)
- 12: Wisconsin Expands Race Preferences (0)
- 11: Reductionism Ad Absurdam (2)
- 10: Conservatism Is Not Monolithic … Or Necessarily Theocentric (0)
- 09: Are Only Blacks Shot “Going To The Gas Station”? (11)
- 09: “Diversity” Reduces Student Drinking And Sexual Abuse? (2)
- 09: The Economist: Affirmative Action Dead, “Diversity Guff” On Last Legs (0)
- 09: Compensatory Affirmative Action? (1)
- 09: Another “C’est Moi!” Justification Of Affirmative Action (1)
- 08: An Analysis Gap Of The Achievement Gap (0)
- 07: More Prop. 2 Humor (0)
- 07: “Unsightly Pimples Of Self-Segregation And Racial Stereotypes” At Yale (1)
- 07: Hoist On Their Own … (0)
- 07: Different Advice For McCain (0)
- 07: Obama’s Mama II (2)
- 06: Berkeley: Black Woman Feels “Excluded” From Traditional Chinese Festival (2)
- 06: Would Wisconsin Race Preferences Violate Wisconsin Law? (0)
- 06: A Sensible Editorial, Sort Of, In The Los Angeles Times (1)
- 06: “Inequities”? MIT To Study Status Of Minority Faculty (0)
- 05: Is UVA’s Housing Policy Racist? (2)
- 05: Is Obama “The Great Black-White Hope”? (1)
- 05: Update / Correction (0)
- 03: St. Pete Parents Unconcerned With Schools’ Race Mix (5)
- 03: Commendable Second, But Unpersuasive Third, Thoughts On Affirmative Action (0)
- 01: Berry Very Unhappy (0)
- 01: White Male Scholarships? (0)
- 01: Racial Preference Policies Favor Foreigners (1)
January 2007
- 31: Promoting Intellectual Diversity: “Disrespectful” And “Vaguely Fascist”? (7)
- 30: “Diversity” And Defiance: A Must-Read Article (5)
- 30: Ban Racial Profiling? O.K. (3)
- 28: Fish Out Of Water (1)
- 28: Equality, Difference, And “Certain Sensitivities” (0)
- 27: Black Graduation Rates (4)
- 26: Colleges Scramble To Find Proxies For Race (1)
- 26: Absurdity Of The Week/Month/Year/… (2)
- 26: Discriminatory “Diversity” Database (2)
- 25: “It Could Be Anyone…” (1)
- 25: Long Term Value Of Proposition 2 (1)
- 24: Mickey On Mommyism (0)
- 23: Does Cost-Benefit Analysis Require A Benefit? (2)
- 23: No “Diversity” For Black Representatives (0)
- 20: Supremes Deny Michigan Delay (1)
- 20: Grand Rapids Mayor Still Supports Affirmative Action (1)
- 20: Princeton Petition (0)
- 19: Euphemism Trifecta (0)
- 19: How The ABA Imposes “Diversity” (2)
- 18: Racial Preferences And “Divisiveness” (1)
- 18: “Diversity,” Everywhere? (4)
- 17: Brown Co-Counsel Supports Quotas (1)
- 17: How Much Does Colorado U. Spend On “Diversity”? (0)
- 17: Surprise! Merit Aid Rewards … Merit (2)
- 15: Fears For Safety Of US Military … (0)
- 15: Two Michigan Puzzles, Posed And Solved (1)
- 13: An Incredible Assertion From Wisconsin (4)
- 11: Juan Williams Joins Bill Cosby … (10)
- 10: Man Bites Dog! U-M To Comply With Prop. 2! (1)
- 10: What If? (0)
- 10: A Debate Over Racial School Assignment (0)
- 09: BAMN, Always Unappealing, Appeals (3)
- 06: Diversity And Distrust II (7)
- 06: CIR Files Suit To Enforce Prop. 2 (1)
- 03: Affirmative Action Without Discrimination? Mais Oui! (1)
- 02: Misinformation From And In The Black Press (2)
Recent Comments