The “Philadelphia Plan” Still Lives

The “Philadelphia Plan” II

Many readers will not know (though some who are as old I am will remember) that “affirmative action” in its current form, i.e., racial preference blending in to racial quotas, originated with President Richard Nixon and his “Philadelphia Plan.”

If proof was needed of Nixon’s role in the creation of affirmative action, it can be found in the story of the 1969 Philadelphia Plan, which required all contractors working on large federally funded projects to adopt “numerical goals and timetables” to assure the desegregation of their workforces….

Although most people have forgotten Nixon’s “Philadelphia Plan,” current residents of Philadelphia have good reason to be familiar with the issues it addressed. The City Council has been withholding contracts to work on a megabucks Convention Center project in an attempt to force the construction and trades unions to “diversify.” The unions have resisted, and recently both sides blinked.

Building trades unions say they will agree to minority hiring goals in order to secure jobs on the $700 million expansion of the Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia.

The unions supplied statistics on their minority membership Monday during a day of negotiations with the City Council. The numbers confirm a newspaper report that about 80 percent of the construction union work force in the region is white and about 70 percent of those workers live outside the city.

The unions pledge to pursue goals of having 50 percent of the convention center workers on the project live in the city, 25 percent be African American, 10 percent be Hispanic American, 5 percent be Asian American and 10 percent be women.

The Council says the unions will report quarterly to a 15-member board to be named by Mayor Michael Nutter.

But rest assured: “goals” are not “quotas.”

Say What? (3)

  1. revisionist February 8, 2008 at 4:06 pm | | Reply

    It should indeed be emphasized that Republicans begining with Nixon and George Schultz (who wrote the Philadelphia Plan) have done just as much to perpetuate racial preferences as Democrats.

    Indeed, McCain refused to support state efforts in Arizona to end preferences, and Bush engineered the University of Michigan compromise (points for race not ok, but don’t ask don’t tell e.g. race ok.) For a devastating critique of McCain re: preferences and anti-assimilation views see

    http://tinyurl.com/yullcu

  2. Allen Martin March 12, 2012 at 3:44 pm | | Reply

    I was fired for being white after we had to hire a black chairman. Still the best treatment of Affirmative Action is that by Shelby Steele, The Content of Our Character. But also see my The Obama Youth - 2013 (Kindle store).

  3. gary martino March 30, 2013 at 11:52 am | | Reply

    I Feel it is wrong to hire people on construction jobs just because they live in the city where the job is. Every time I work the taxes that are deducted from my check goes to every city in the state where I live in. the cities in America are not sovereign they belong to every one that are citizens of the U.S.A . People that live in the city that belong to a union think they have the right to get all the union construction jobs. I know for A fact that companies do not like that rule. People that belong to unions have cars they could be sent to jobs out side the city.

Say What?