« More Race Politics From the Un-Post-Racial Candidate | Main | Change, Small Change, Exchange? »

CNNsorship?

Gathering after the speeches last night by Lieberman and Thompson, the CNN “political team” gathered to tell viewers what was wrong with what they said. No surprises there, except perhaps when Campbell Brown professed herself to be “surprised by the political nature” of the Bushes’ speeches. Imagine that! Political speeches at a political convention!

Regarding the speeches by Thompson and Lieberman, Brown then went on to say that she “still trying to get [her] arms around what they were hoping to accomplish and whether there was a real message” in what they said.

“Does all of that” — you know, the hero bit, the character, the experience, all that stuff —

convey to people that this is the man you want in the foxhole with you? There’s so much at stake in this election, you can’t take any risk. And ultimately what we find as this conversation continues, that he undermines that argument by his choice of vice president.
Do “we,” indeed? I’m reminded of Tonto’s famous reply when the Lone Ranger turned to him and said, “we’re surrounded.”

Even more striking, however, was a comment of Wolf Blitzer, the ostensible moderator. I assume CNN considers him an objective, neutral observer, and thus not a member of the “political team,” since his comments during this round table discussion are not provided on the CNN site linked above. Or perhaps there’s another reason why his comments don’t appear, since in discussing whether Lieberman’s appeal to Democrats and Independents would be effective he said (the following is from notes and memory, not a CNN transcript, since there isn’t one), “Since he praised Palin, why would anyone believe what he said about McCain?”

It’s not hard to imagine that many viewers, or non-viewers, ask a very similar question about Blitzer and his “political team.”

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discriminations.us/sa/mt-tb.cgi/6790

Say What?

I keep getting a faint vibe of disapproval of McCain and Palin for actually, you know, trying to win. Actually, I got the same vibe about Hillary before that contest was over, when I read all the articles about how she was being pressured to step aside and let Obama have the nomination. I'm sure Obama has a sense of entitlement - they all must, or they wouldn't be in the race - but that doesn't mean we all have to share it with him.

The comment that you did not have a transcript for was about Lieberman. The gist of the comment was that since Palin is diametrically opposed to Lieberman on virtually all non-security/non-war issues it was surprising to hear that he supports her as VP....And that if he claims to support her that would appear to be a total fabrication. If one is a fabricator about one issue why would you expect them to be forthright on other issues. (When I saw it I was actually struck by how little Lieberman wanted to talk about Palin, and responded to the questions with "we better just pray for good health McCain.")

Post a comment