« Scientists Worry That Race Is Real | Main | Obama Forthrightly Opposes, Then Forthrightly Supports, Affirmative Action »

Is Arizona Different?

Doug MacEachern, an editorial writer at the Arizona Republic, argues in an article today that Ward Connerly’s confidence that the Arizona Civil Rights Initiative will pass may be misplaced. (In fact, he calls Connerly “a wee bit cocky.”)

After noting that similar initiatives have been passed in states far more liberal and Democratic than Arizona, MacEachern offers only one explanation for what he obviously hopes will be Arizona’s exceptionalism:

But Arizona is different from those states in one key respect. And it's not something that necessarily reflects well on this state: College admissions programs are the primary battleground of the racial-preference wars, and the fact is Arizona colleges are not terribly selective about who gets to attend.
As we’ve recently seen (here), it is not at all clear that preferential treatment is not practiced in Arizona, especially at its state law schools. But let us assume for the sake of argument that MacEachern is right, that preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity is not widespread enough to engender any opposition. But so, one might ask, what?

MacEachern’s point, so far as I can tell, is that Arizonans may vote against barring the state from discriminating against or giving preferential treatment to anyone based on race or ethnicity because it doesn’t do so, or doesn’t do so very much. But if writing a core national value — that Americans have a right to be treated without regard to race, creed, or color — into the state constitution would not bar anything of value, then why vote against it? Why will civil rights groups, university administrators, and, yes, editorial writers at major newspapers vociferously oppose a measure that, according to editorial writer MacEachern, would have no measurable effect?

Is MacEachern saying that Arizonans oppose the principle of colorblind equality, i.e., the “without regard” principle, in principle, even where affirming it would not deprive them of anything some of them value? That would be odd, indeed.

If so, then Arizona really is different.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discriminations.us/sa/mt-tb.cgi/6401

Say What?

I think frankly that McEachern is trolling forth with his elliptical and strange argument out of a sense of hope that somehow an anti-preference measure will not pass. But really, it such a measure can pass in Michigan, it is beyond doubt as to what will happen in Arizona. And it is too difficult for "progressives" to come directly to grips with the fact that their favorite means of assuaging white guilt will no longer be available - hence theses elliptical and strange statements.

Post a comment