How The ABA Imposes “Diversity”
Gail Heriot tells a chilling tale of how the American Bar Association imposes its views of “diversity” on law schools. And note that the tale told here involves an accreditation review that took place before the ABA revised its standards to put much more emphasis on “results” than on equal opportunity. (HatTip to reader Richard Palmer and InstaPundit)
Say What?
Roger Clegg writes:
>>>"The fact is that, in this country at least, we do not “represent” a color. We represent only our individual selves. There is no reason that our qualifications should be judged differently just because more or fewer of those already chosen happen to share or not share our particular melanin content."
What nation is Clegg talking about? He certainly isn't talking about the United States of America. His polyanna view of race in America is not only hilarious, but non-supportable with facts.
I guess if one constantly repeats propaganda enough, you start to think it's actually true.
--Cobra
Posted by: Cobra![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.discriminations.us/nav-commenters.gif)
|
January 20, 2007 12:37 AM
Cobra --
A Congressional representative speaks for a group of citizens for the purpose of law making.
A union representative speaks for fellow employees with management in labor matters.
A sales representative speaks to customers on behalf of products and the company that produces them.
Does a racial representative presumptively speak for the people of their race? If a racial representative pulls a gun on me should I blame everyone of that race or should I hold only one individual in content?
As John asserted: "We represent only our individual selves."
Posted by: eddy | January 20, 2007 12:49 PM