superdestroyerOctober 3, 2004 at 12:04 pm | Permalink | Reply
In reading the article I love how the effort worded its cause to leave “historically black universities” untouched by the need for diversity. I wonder why Howard University does not set up a booth at college day at Thomas Jefferson High School in northern Virginia. Is it because Howard University has not comment to having a diverse college experience for its overwhelming black student body?
At each juncture, the pro-diversity have the burden of proof, to show how this additional increment of diversity, is a betterment. Since they are unable to do this, and scarcely even try; they have to pretend that those who do not believe in more affirmative action should prove that is undesirable. They should prove that the uplift of minorities on a racial basis is moral; but they can’t, because it involves the use of aggression by government, to move beyond the pathetic realm of racial charity for the downtrodden.
In reading the article I love how the effort worded its cause to leave “historically black universities” untouched by the need for diversity. I wonder why Howard University does not set up a booth at college day at Thomas Jefferson High School in northern Virginia. Is it because Howard University has not comment to having a diverse college experience for its overwhelming black student body?
At each juncture, the pro-diversity have the burden of proof, to show how this additional increment of diversity, is a betterment. Since they are unable to do this, and scarcely even try; they have to pretend that those who do not believe in more affirmative action should prove that is undesirable. They should prove that the uplift of minorities on a racial basis is moral; but they can’t, because it involves the use of aggression by government, to move beyond the pathetic realm of racial charity for the downtrodden.