Racial Privacy? Not Enough Time To Decide

Ed Still at votelaw.com reports that MALDEF has sued to keep the Ward Connerly privacy initiative off the October 7 ballot in California. It claims that the Voting Rights Act requires that voters in counties subject to pre-clearance (there are four in Calif.) must receive ballot information 100 days before the vote, and that the 57 days voters in Monterey County will have is “too short a time frame to digest the proposition and what it means,” according to a MALDEF staff attorney.

Say What? (2)

  1. mj August 7, 2003 at 9:09 am | | Reply

    That didn’t make a difference in NY during the Lautenberg substitution. From my perspective determining a candidate’s views on a range of subjects is more time consuming than reaching a decision on a single policy matter.

  2. mj August 7, 2003 at 9:10 am | | Reply

    Should be NJ, of course.

Say What?