« Muller Mulls Scalia On Michigan | Main | Appalling Rall »

Virginia Tech Reverses Ban On Affirmative Action (Or Does It? See UPDATE)

The Board of Rectors of Virginia Tech has reversed its March 10 decision to ban racial preferences, bowing to pressure from students, faculty, and Governor Mark Warner (Link requires subscription).

"The voice of the people was so loud and so constant that it had to be heard," said Edd Sewell, an associate professor of communication studies and president of the University Council, Virginia Tech's faculty senate. "The coalition of students, faculty, and alumni came together and let their opinion be known to the board, and it made a difference."
After the Board's initial decision (which also suspended a gay rights policy and barred outsiders who had engaged in violence from speaking on campus), I quoted Sewell's somewhat less measured remarks about Virginia Tech being turned in a proto-Nazi police state:
"I’m sorry," he said, "they are systematically deconstructing the freedoms, the civil rights of the people at this university...." "It certainly puts Virginia Tech in the light that we are no longer a viable academic community," he said. Sewell likened the BOV’s actions to pre-World War II Germany. At the beginning of the Nazi rise to power, civil liberties were quietly rolled back, people were discriminated against and people merely stood by and watched it happen. That’s exactly what is happening now at Tech, Sewell said. "I think we need to start reading the history of the 1930s," he said.
What I find most interesting about the Board's reinstating affirmative action is the stated reason for it. Ben Davenport, a Board member, said that he had come to realize
that what the board had done was "extremely disruptive" to admissions, faculty recruitment, and fund raising, and had damaged the reputation of Virginia Tech among other universities.
We certainly wouldn't want those other universities to think ill of us, would we?

UPDATE - Reader Fred Ray calls my attention to an article in the Washington Post this morning that I hadn't gotten around to reading. The article, "Race-Neutral Policies Planned at Va. Tech," seems to contradict what reported above.

The chairman of Virginia Tech's Board of Visitors vowed yesterday that the school will follow race-neutral admissions and scholarship policies despite Sunday's decision to abandon a controversial resolution ending affirmative action at the Virginia university.
[....]
[Chairman of the Va. Tech Board of Visitors, Rector John Rocovich said he hopes Sunday's decision will end the immediate controversy. But he said the school is still bound by legal agreements and repeated warnings from Attorney General Jerry W. Kilgore (R), who has said that board members and college officials could be held personally liable if the federal government or a private individual sued the school for discrimination.

"When the attorney general tells me to do something, I believe I ought to do it," Rocovich said. "The board decided to rescind because the specific language seemed to upset so many people."

So, what is the current status of racial preferences at Virginia Tech? No one seems to know. The Board has, you guessed it, created a committee to study the problem. According to Attorney General Kilgore, who opposes preferences,
They are going to review each and every program. They are going to make sure that if race and gender are used, they are used in a narrowly tailored fashion.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discriminations.us/sa/mt-tb.cgi/3655

Say What?

The Xerox Memo --- Try to defend affirmative action after you read this:

This is an actual 1968 memo from Xerox Ceo Joseph C. Wilson. This is the smoking gun that proves that affirmative action lowers the standards wherever it touches. Corporate America and academia don't want you to see this -- thousands of similar memos have been written over the years.

Black Caucus Groups at Xerox Corporation (A) 49~-O47

Exhibit 4 Wilson and McColough’s 1968 Letter


May 2, 1968

To All Xerox Managers:

We at Xerox are among those who are compelled to accept
the indictment of the National Advisory Commission on
Civil Disorders: What white Americans have never fully
understood -- but what the Negro can never forget -- is
that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto.
White institutions created it. white institutions maintain
it, and white society condones it.’

We, like all other Americans, share the responsibility for
a color-divided nation; and in all honesty, we need not
look beyond our own doorstep to find out why.

In Rochester, one of the first American cities scarred by
racial strife, Xerox continues to employ only a very small
percentage of Negroes. In other major -cities, including
some that have suffered even greater violence, we employ
no Negroes at all.

Thus, despite a stated policy that seeks to fulfill our
obligations to society -- and even though the significant
steps we have taken have been publicly praised -- our
performance is still far from a shining beacon of corporate
responsibility.

We know, of course, that many Negroes - fearing rejection -
simply don’t apply to Xerox for jobs. And of those who do
apply, many fail to meet our usual standards of qualification.
But those factors obviously cannot be used as excuses. They
are, rather, the very problems which Xerox must and will attack
in the future.

In order to respond with concerted action to the Advisory
Commission’s recommendations that American industry hire,
train and suitably employ one million Negroes within the
next three years, we are therefore going to adopt these
immediate courses of action:

First, we will heavily intensify our recruiting of Negroes
and other minorities, If, as our past experience indicates,
they are reluctant to dome to us, then we will go to them.


A special recruiting effort at University Microfilms in
Ann Arbor, Michigan has proved the validity of this approach
by substantially increasing minority employment in the space
of a few months. We will now extend that effort throughout
all the departments, divisions, and subsidiaries of Xerox.

Secondly, all managers responsible for hiring -- regardless
of geographical location -- will re-examine their selection
standards and training programs. Our past efforts, by and
large, have sought to find only the best qualified people
for Xerox, regardless of age, race or religion. But that
goal, however valid, has inadvertently excluded many good
people from productive employment.

We are, accordingly, going to change the selection standards
that screen out all but the most qualified people. We will
also begin devoting special attention to minority employees
of limited qualifications to make them genuinely productive
in the shortest possible time. Hopefully we can maintain
standards of performance throughout.

Effective immediately, therefore, all Xerox managers are
directed, on an individual basis, to begin this effort, pending
a more systematic company-wide revision of standards.

Thirdly, we are planning to increase substantially our training
of unqualified Negroes, and other minority members.

Although the Project Step Up Program to qualify people for
entry level jobs has been successful in the Rochester area,
we feel that its scope must be considerably broadened and the
entry requirements modified. We are presently planning to
incorporate the program into our present hiring process, and
to extend it to major Xerox facilities outside Rochester.

The full and unqualified cooperation of all Xerox managers
is expected in reaching our minority hiring goals. Corporate
Personnel has been given the responsibility for implementing
our plans, and for establishing an accountability system
through which top management -- beginning immediately -- can
regularly assess progress in all divisions, departments and
subsidiaries of the corporation.

Today there are 22 million Negroes in the United States.
The exclusion of many of them from our society is a
malignancy that the nation cannot endure. To include them as
integral to the nation, however, will mean even more than
the correction of an intolerable injustice. It will also
mean the creation of an enormous and affluent market for
new products and services, and of an equally enormous pool
of manpower to help meet the critical shortages predicted
for the future.

We are fully aware, of course, of the progress that Xerox
has already made in assisting the dvii rights movement.

But it simply has not gone far enough.

We must do more because Xerox will not add to the misery of
the present condition of most Negroes. It will not condone
the waste of a great national resource. It will not com~
promise the conviction on which the success of this enterprise
and of the nation depends.

Joseph C. Wilson C. Peter McColough

(comment on this)

Actually, I don't think this is too bad. Points made in this letter:

Black people aren't applying to work at Xerox because they assume they will not be hired. We'll have to make a special effort to recruit blacks so they will see this is not the case.

Some of them don't qualify, and that's a problem we need to address with training.

We've hired only the best, but with training we think we can reach out to this other group without hurting productivity.

Fostering economic improvement among black people will work toward increasing our customer base.

This beats the heck out of arbitrarily adding 20 points to the score if the prospective student is black. Xerox's answer to wretched public schools was to fix the problem with training; U of M's answer is to ignore them. And remember, in 1968 black people had a whole lot more to overcome than they do now. Some don't think so but I certainly do.

Post a comment