“Affirmative Action Baby” … Or Survivor?

Cecillia Wang, Director of the ACLU’s Immigrant Rights Project, has written an ACLU blog entry, “Reflections of Another Affirmative Action Baby,” describing the wonders of the new world “diversity” opened up for her as an undergraduate at Berkeley.

I arrived at the University of California at Berkeley in the fall of 1988. I didn’t have far to travel. I crammed my belongings into my used Honda and drove to the other end of the county. In 40 minutes, I crossed over into a new world.

I came from a large public high school that was 92% white and 6% Asian-American. While I was growing up, Asian-American kids often suffered racist jeers and sometimes physical attacks. I felt hurt and rage about this, but didn’t know what to do about it. I lacked the intellectual and social tools. I don’t recall race being a subject of public conversation, even in our social studies and English classes. It was a good school and we had fun in our suburban way, but I was waiting for better days.

When I got to Berkeley, I experienced – there is no other way to describe it – liberation. In my dorm, in my classes, in student groups, my little world cracked wide open and in came a flood of new people and new ideas. I was thrown in with African-American kids from South Central L.A. and small Central Valley towns, Asian-American kids from majority-Asian schools in Hawaii and southern California, Chicano kids from border towns, my white roommate from a tiny town in the Sierra Foothills, and another roommate who was a rare bird from the Upper East Side of Manhattan. My friends and neighbors were rich, poor, middle-class, gay, straight, disabled, able-bodied, Republican, Democrat, Maoist (I’m not kidding). Sometimes we got along, and sometimes we didn’t.

Ms. Wang may well be a “diversity” baby — or perhaps a bona fide born again ”diversity” baby — but she definitely does not deserve the mantle of “affirmative action baby” in which she wraps herself. On the contrary, she is clearly an affirmative action survivor — a bright, talented Asian who was accepted at Berkeley in spite of affirmative action, which in 1988 (well before the passage of Prop. 209) significantly raised admission standards for Asians and lowered them for blacks and Hispanics. She may well approve of that policy, since she survived it, but I suspect some of her Asian American high school classmates who might well have been accepted to Berkeley in the absence of affirmative action preferences for others might have a different view.

Black Law Prof: Affirmative Action Helps The Wrong Blacks

Kevin Brown, a law professor at Indiana University who says that he was a beneficiary of affirmative action at Yale Law School, claims that affirmative action is helping the wrong blacks.

Colleges are giving fewer and fewer spots to “the traditional African-American” students with two black parents, whose ancestors endured discrimination, while giving more spots to black immigrants, Brown told Business Insider.

Black immigrants, who started coming to the U.S. in larger numbers after the 1970s, tend to have higher incomes than non-immigrant blacks, which leads to stronger college applications.  Now there are a disproportionately high number of black immigrants at elite colleges….

Brown says colleges should make a special effort to include “traditional African Americans” as well as immigrants.

“Traditional African-Americans …  clearly have a far greater claim to being members of a group that has suffered from the history of discrimination based on race and ethnicity….”

Prof. Brown, despite his Yale Law School education, appears to be unaware that the Supreme Court has ruled out compensation for past discrimination as a justification for the current racial discrimination on which affirmative action relies.

The risk of promoting group rights over individual rights is that you might find yourself, like Prof. Brown and “traditional African Americans,” in the wrong group.

ADDENDUM

Prof. Brown is not the first supporter of affirmative action to notice that it all too often benefits the wrong blacks, something I discussed nearly a decade ago in Preferentialists: Hoisted On Their Own Pétard!

A Big Reason Obamagates Will Never = Watergate

Just under 40% of the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee voted in favor of articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. It is impossible to imagine anything approaching that number of Democrats ever abandoning Barack Obama, no matter what it may be proved he knew and when he knew it.

Profiling Profilers

Ilya Somin has an instructive post on Volokh, commenting on a Slate article by Farhad Manjoo, discussing the similarities among political profiling by the IRS (which all claim to hate), racial profiling by police (which some conservatives defend), and racial profiling by admissions offices and employers (which all liberals support).

Maybe Obama Doesn’t Know…

InstaPundit describes as “cognitive dissonance” a recent poll finding that 50% still approve of President Obama but 57% disapprove of the country’s direction. Another possibility: Maybe the approvers take him at his word that he knew nothing about the nefarious activities of the “two rogue agents in Cincinnati,” the refusals to re-enforce or rescue his agents in Benghazi, [...]

The IRS Scandal As An Expression Of Identity Politics

Since regular readers of this blog are well aware that all roads ultimately wind their way back to “diversity” and affirmative action, some will have wondered exactly how I would relate the ongoing Obama scandals to those racial issues and why I have taken so long. Well, your anxious wait is over. With considerable help [...]

Means, Ends, And (Of Course) “Diversity”

Alex Tabarrok has an interesting post on Marginal Revolution discussing a recent paper that investigated whether the academic performance of low ability students was improved by grouping them in peer groups with high performance students. The short answer? No. In fact, the authors found a negative and signi ficant treatment eff ect for the students we intended to help. We [...]

A Civil (Or Uncivil) War In … The Washington Post?

Bernanke Gets One Thing Right

Obama As The New Nixon ... And Reagan ... And Bush

Obama As The New Nixon … And Reagan … And Bush

Is Class A Better Proxy For Race Than Race?

The Obama Administration’s Overreach And [Underreach?]

Baseball’s “Diversity” Rhetoric Strikes Out

Washington Post Links To Racial Drivel

Quotas At Harvard Law School

The High Cost Of Free Speech At UVa

This Dogma Won’t Hunt